Its actually the opposite. The low quality comments come mostly from the supporters of the highly controversal pull request, including yourself. I have read it all.
Bitcoin is money, Bitcoin is distributed blockchain for transactional data. What you want to achieve is some kind of NFT shitcoin storing random data. That is real bad.
Adding shitcoins like ETH and SOL to the discussion? I must stop myself of commenting this ...
For the sake of completeness you have written your goal in clear text.
Good job ignoring the next sentence.
I don't ignore it and I show your comment in full. You give shitcoins as example. There is a reason shitcoins are a fail. All of them are centralized, manipulatable, rugpull mentality garbage.
And don't get me wrong. I respect your good contributions and given the status you have its not easy for me to oppose your opinion. But I can't compromise my morale.
I want Bitcoin to stay the freedom decentralized unstoppable money it is and to fix the world for good.
And we saw already spam attacks like Inscriptions make fees high making use of Bitcoin by ordinary people harder.
What you should have seen is that spam attacks are unsustainable.
Over the long term, only economically viable use of block space can survive.
I would prefer for them to be both economically unsustainable and prevented by security controls as far as possible.
Bitcoin's main objective is monetary network, not decentralized store of random data.
