Not trying to waste your time.

Gish gallup, I believe, is the term closest to that.

I'd say calling what I shared a gish gallup is a strawman.

I just was sharing the unsolved mysteries pole flip edition facts. Other causes could explain a number of them like continental drift, meteor impacts, etc. To be fair to the Occam's razor conversation, periodic pole flips resolves them all and explains a lot of other things, boiling it down to mostly one unknown: what triggers the induced fluidity in the top most layer of the asthenosphere by like 17 orders of magnitude for less than a day once every 6,000 years or so and what does a geomagnetic excursion have to do with it?

To be fair, the premise under debate encompasses a global scope. The pole flip possibility is not on most people's radar, so it would be necessary, in order to 'make the case' so to speak, to provide whatever ample evidence one has in favor of the theory in as reasonably concise a way as possible. With a global scope, making an underdog run, so to speak, for top dog in terms of hypothetical viability, one ought to expect at least a few pages worth of points. At a certain point, too much concision excludes the greater consilience that the collection of points, together, are meant to offer.