ChatGTP: “The fear is that AI-generated art might become a sort of fast-food version of culture: quick, convenient but lacking in substance. However, it’s worth considering the flip side: AI tools can also be seen as an extension of the artist’s palette - offering new ways to experiment and create. For centuries, artists have used tools and technologies from the printing press to the digital camera to push boundaries and explore new forms of expression. In this view, AI isn’t a replacement for human creativity but a catalyst that can inspire artists to stretch their imaginations further. The key here, I think, is intent and context. If AI-generated art is presented as a genuine expression of human emotion or experience, then yes,

we might feel that’s misleading or inauthentic. But if it’s used as a tool among many in the creative process, then it can add value without necessarily diminishing the art form. At the end of the day, what makes art, music or poetry resonate is not just the arrangement of words or notes, but the emotional and intellectual depth behind them. And that’s something AI, for all its technical prowess, can’t replicate.”

(From: “In AI We Trust?” interview by Tim Nash with AI chatbot ChatGTP