It’s meant to create confusion. If there are suddenly orders of magnitude more bitcoin, it undermines the entire narrative and turns normies off because they’ll think it’s a scam.
nevent1qqsqqqt9vhz9ksv5wztuhm0x02rwfd58u9uyv57schfuv94fs6srvpspzfmhxue69uhk7enxvd5xz6tw9ec82cs6389ur
You know, I wonder sometimes, "What the fuck is wrong with Jack Dorsey?"
He's so committed to open sauce and decentralization but he doesn't seem to understand the money aspect of money.
I’m starting to think he’s an op, personally
Me too
I keep hearing the same goddamn narrative, even one part of it from Matthew Kratter, that Bitcoin fails if we don't use it for exchange actively, but they say specifically, "if it doesn't become a medium of exchange," bitch it already is a medium of exchange, and we have the technology to use it in that capacity in better and better ways!! It fails if we don't do that, but we are doing that, we cannot help but do that!! Bitcoin succeeds regardless. Each individual just has to choose to join and choose which part of the system he participates in at any moment. Which layer he uses, which node to run, etc. Kratter understands that so I don't think he's an op, not by a long shot, but he might have let some ops sway his rhetoric slightly.
It took me a long ass time to learn but I learned. Like bro you have time. Learn why your whims are wrong.
