Needless to say, Jake lived long enough to be the villain in the story, which does not exactly put his past content in good light no matter how good or researched it may appear.
Discussion
Uh-oh, what did I miss?
He went bonkers pretty much. Unfollowed him when in his video about how to not get scammed some nft, he launched some nft project as a sponsor (wolf society? ) - turned out to be his rugpull token. Later, in video about dangers of financial advise gurus he promoted Yotta and so on, always dissing something as bad, then promoting his own "good" alternative which is the same shit. One could argue "he warned ya", but in reality he pretty much sold out his userbase who thought of him as "authority", while at the same time, just switching to clickbait ai generated content for segments where is is NOT rugpulling them (and thus does not care about retaining attention, just clicks).
Goddammit, Jake!
I somehow missed all of that stuff while still being subscribed to him. I think YT knows I absolutely loathe content with crypto in the title/description.
Still, I don't see why him getting greedy would discount the validity of earlier research. Some of his films have absolutely been proven right.