GLC - Guns Don't Kill People, Rappers Do

https://music.youtube.com/watch?v=2qPXGcRPAwk

WordAll #634 completed in 1m 03s

🟩🟩🟩🟩 πŸ‘ˆ perfect game!

wordall.xyz

Wordle 905 3/6*

β¬›πŸŸ¨β¬›β¬›πŸŸ¨

πŸŸ¨πŸŸ¨β¬›β¬›πŸŸ©

🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩

https://www.nytimes.com/games/wordle/index.html

#Worldle #689 3/6 (100%) (cheated a bit)

πŸŸ©πŸŸ©πŸŸ¨β¬›β¬›β†™οΈ

πŸŸ©πŸŸ©πŸŸ©πŸŸ©β¬›β†—οΈ

πŸŸ©πŸŸ©πŸŸ©πŸŸ©πŸŸ©πŸŽ‰

β­β­β­πŸ“

https://worldle.teuteuf.fr

SiΓ±or or siΓ±orita La Palabra Del DΓ­a keeps sensible hours and is not burdened by an inflamed spine or acutely itchy nostril. Hopefully anyway, I wish them nothing but the best.

Le Mot (@WordleFR) #701 3/6

πŸŸ©β¬›πŸŸ¨πŸŸ©β¬›

πŸŸ©β¬›πŸŸ¨πŸŸ©πŸŸ©

🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩

https://wordle.louan.me

Framed #640 (no. Watched a documentary called "Bad Host: Hunting the Couch Surfing Predator" which was sad, harrowing, and kind of indicative of a kind of blind optimism that exists independently of technology, like attitudes towards hitchhiking in the 1960s/1970s, but is often made apparent by it. In the same way that minority of croudfunders consciously grift a minority of people offering couch surfing are, at best, creeps. In that case the perpetrator went much further. Technology enabled him, but I'm sceptical he wouldn't have found a way to be a predator without technology. Which is the central issue with technology: does it cause categories of crime (and social ills) or does it illuminate them? Is it an "after/with this therefore because of this" fallacy? Would there been even less of a chance of catching him before the technology that enabled him? Clearly the companies involved could have and should have done more, but ultimately the blame lies with the perpetrator. There is also a battle between optimism versus pessimism, and either as a binary position is difficult to logically rectify but reassuringly simplistic. See also cryptocurrencies and money.)

πŸŽ₯ πŸŸ₯ πŸŸ₯ πŸŸ₯ πŸŸ₯ πŸŸ₯ πŸŸ₯

https://framed.wtf

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

No replies yet.