The integration of highly skilled economic immigrants into local communities can be complex and fraught with challenges. Here are some key points addressing your questions:

### Resentment Towards Locals

1. **Cultural Differences**: Highly skilled immigrants often come from different cultural backgrounds, leading to misunderstandings and cultural clashes. If locals perceive these immigrants as elitist or out of touch, resentment can grow.

2. **Economic Competition**: Skilled immigrants may be seen as competition for jobs, especially if they are willing to work for lower wages or possess skills that locals do not. This can create feelings of resentment among locals who fear job loss or decreased wages.

3. **Perception of Superiority**: Highly skilled immigrants might be perceived as viewing themselves as superior, particularly if they come from wealthier nations or have higher educational qualifications. This perception can foster contempt and resistance from local populations.

### Aligning Skills with Contempt

1. **Social Isolation**: If immigrants feel marginalized or discriminated against, they may withdraw from local social networks and turn to their own communities, further entrenching their differences.

2. **Activism and Advocacy**: In some cases, immigrants may leverage their skills to advocate for their communities or to challenge local norms, sometimes aligning their professional efforts with a sense of contempt for the local population. This could involve mobilizing resources, knowledge, or technology to support their cause.

### Impact of Organized Violence

1. **Increased Vulnerability**: The threat of organized violence can heighten feelings of insecurity among immigrants, leading to a greater need for community support and solidarity within their groups. This may intensify their alignment with each other and further alienate them from locals.

2. **Fear and Distrust**: As violence increases, immigrants may develop a deep mistrust of local authorities or the local population, perceiving them as either complicit in the violence or incapable of providing protection.

3. **Radicalization**: In extreme cases, threats of violence may lead some immigrants to radicalize, aligning their skills with more aggressive forms of resistance against perceived oppression.

### Historical Context of Small Groups

1. **Coercive Tactics**: Historically, small groups have often used strategic methods, such as propaganda, economic sabotage, or organized protests, to weaken larger populations or governments. This can lead to significant shifts in power dynamics.

2. **Resource Mobilization**: Small groups can effectively mobilize resources and leverage their skills to challenge local power structures, often through unexpected or innovative means, leading to a disproportionate impact compared to their size.

### Colonial Legacy

1. **Complex Dynamics**: Immigration from former colonial powers can introduce additional complexities, including historical grievances, perceptions of neo-colonialism, and power imbalances. Locals may feel resentment based on past exploitation and current inequalities.

2. **Cultural Hegemony**: Immigrants from colonial superpowers might unintentionally perpetuate cultural hegemony, reinforcing stereotypes and tensions. This can lead to further resentment and resistance from local populations.

3. **Transformative Potential**: Conversely, such immigration can also lead to cross-cultural exchanges and opportunities for collaboration, but this potential is often overshadowed by historical tensions.

### Conclusion

The dynamics of immigration and integration are shaped by a myriad of factors, including cultural perceptions, economic competition, historical contexts, and the threat of violence. Understanding these complexities is essential for fostering better relations between immigrants and local communities.