Nostr

I agree.

There are real Bitcoiners who believe in the separation of money and state, who haven’t fully thought this through.

They think we can just insert our people into this system and stop the money printing by passing some legal tender laws and the rest will follow.

It most assuredly will not.

We’ve got to rebuild this whole thing. As ancap as I am, I recognise people want States, they want some shit just taken care of for them. We won’t succeed unless we can provide a construct for them which meets their needs.

That’s gonna make a lot of the more anarchist Bitcoiners uncomfortable. They don’t want power and that’s why only they can be entrusted with it.

Let the others cash out. Bitcoin is the means to revolution needed in the face of this globalist coup and we’re gonna see who is ready to stand up and be counted for what really matters.

TheBitcoinManual 1y ago

I'm with you, I think it comes in different flavours, circular economies, autonomous regions, break away countries, island nations or something like El Salvador

I think the country play is a bit tougher because your ass can be voted out along with your plans, maybe if its a monarch where someone wants to stay in power for generations a Bitcoin standard becomes attractive

Will be interesting to see this thing in the multi-trillion market range, where early holders have so much combined purchasing power and singular focus, could they purchase land from countries and outcompete the local government? Its a possibility

Reply to this note

Discussion