Replying to Avatar Ava

Maybe you need a Monero.

https://v.nostr.build/WZ72ew3sNLZmxWKu.mp4

"If Bitcoin diverted all of their energy to make itself private and became known as a network of complete and utter privacy, it probably is counterproductive to its own interests, because you don't want the United States government to say Bitcoin is completely private [...]

There's no way you're going to get 100 trillion dollars to flow into Bitcoin if its use case is directly against the interest of a government that it's within, right, so ... you don't want to be that good."

- Michael Saylor (interview with Peter McCormack)

YT

https://youtu.be/ccJ33hLaMF0

It's a bit simplistic to say A is better than B, because of X, while ignoring Y.

More concretely, Bitcoin has a supply cap, and Monero doesn't, which gives it more value IMHO.

Monero's USP is privacy, which gives it great utility, but it will never be a SOV.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Who said that? Nor me. Like I've said time and time again:

I stack sats (i.e., invest in a historically well-performing, highly regulated speculative asset), and I stack and use Monero when privacy is important (which for me, is always).

Then we're in violent agreement ;)

Both are good, for different reasons.

🤝

Like gold can't be a SoV?

because of supply inflation?

Moneros supply increases at a lower rate than golds.

Might want to rethink this champ.