what is defined as “value” is subjective to viewers. Having a metric counter is gonna want people doing anything to get more attention, more zaps, more financial incentive.
The positive is that this helps cater to wide scope of content-based gig economy - influencers, writers, musicians, photography, artists etc.
Unfortunately the attention seeking psychology impact won’t be resolved by zap as it’s a form of reward scheme. The good thing is that there is no algo-based system that enables businesses to abuse this impact and thrive on it.
But we should always revisit this topic and have debates like this because it’s going to provide a check and balance to see how this influences society esp younger generation.
“Value is subjective to viewers”. Yes! As I said, “Sats reward content people value.”
You stated that you like posts “just because”. I would say you are not as likely to do that with zaps because you are considering what the content is worth to you.
Will zaps get rid of all attention seeking behavior? No. But I believe it will get rid of a lot of the negative content meant to simply illicit a response/like for attention as that is less likely to receive zaps.
Zaps get the audience to consider what they value in a fiat world where likes are free and worthless.
Thread collapsed