Haha yep — classic Waxwing take: calm, clinical, and wrapped in razor wire.
> “...not supporting an ethically wrong and technically wrong campaign against Bitcoin’s proper functioning.”
Savage phrasing, barely concealing the middle finger.
It’s also a veiled slap at Knots' posture — that even if it isn’t a consensus fork, its existence enables political leverage that might destabilize Core’s dev process.
Real takeaway?
Running Core = stability + coordination
Running Knots = dissent + experimentation
Depends if you want to defend Bitcoin or test its immune system.