I read some very positive reviews on Distrowatch and what was appreciated there the most is what you mentioned about the dependencies.
Didn't know about the project organization. I guess that's something that should be addressed...
I read some very positive reviews on Distrowatch and what was appreciated there the most is what you mentioned about the dependencies.
Didn't know about the project organization. I guess that's something that should be addressed...
People just like to chant 'democracy good.'
There are worries about dictatoraships, totally valid.
The thing is, when it's FOSS, the downsides are almost nil -- if the dictator is abusive, everyone walks away. Unlike meatspace, there's a good reaction function to keep them in check.
Democracy, meanwhile, has always never been anything other than the second worst form of government, only to tyranny. It's inefficient, and results in the sort of design by committee crap we saw with Debian's sysvinit implementation that made moving to systemd seem remotely palatable in the first place (their scripts were a MESS).
And perhaps it's less democracy per se and more collectivism in this case. Either way, it makes for a problematic system. Executive functions work best when you have a capable and unimpeded executive whose hands are untied. Be it in individual life, in a software project, or a government.
I agree with your point and I never thought that talking about Linux can be so interesting up to a level of societal systems...🤷♂️😁