Bitcoin’s decentralization is its core strength. It ensures no single entity can control the network, protecting its neutrality, censorship resistance, and global accessibility. This resilience is what makes #Bitcoin the foundation of sound money for a digital age.

However, decentralization isn’t just about running nodes—it’s also about making it feasible for more people to do so. That’s why we must prioritize simplicity in Bitcoin’s node software. Complex code not only increases the risk of bugs but also raises barriers to understanding, auditing, and maintaining the protocol.

By keeping the codebase lean and efficient, we ensure Bitcoin remains accessible to individuals, not just corporations or institutions. A simpler, more transparent protocol strengthens trust and encourages broader participation—essential for Bitcoin’s long-term health.

Decentralization isn’t automatic; it’s a choice we make every day. Let’s commit to safeguarding Bitcoin’s ethos by valuing simplicity and inclusivity in its design.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Word.

More people need to run nodes?

Too bad no incentives for the heavy overhead

The more people running nodes, the harder it becomes to disrupt the Bitcoin network. Running a node is currently affordable and relatively simple, and every Bitcoin update should prioritize making it even easier and more accessible. Decentralization thrives when participation grows

Yes but there is no user incentive

Cant even make a dollar a month

Not worth it for most people to run a node

Isn't the ability to verify your own balance and broadcast transactions privately an incentive?

It also likely depends on how much Bitcoin you hold—strengthening the network is surely worth it if you're storing significant value.

And how much does running a node cost? Just a couple of dollars a month? 😅

Its more out than in. Electricity keeps going up. You can use Exodus wallet for free lol

I only run a node because of lightning

- Isn't the ability to verify your own balance and broadcast transactions privately an incentive?

- Wouldn't you care about secure a network that hold a big chunk of your net worth?

To me, both answers are a YES