I don't understand, what makes the protocol shitty? Looks to me that someone could build easily a strictly moderated platform using their own relays
Discussion
If that's true then we'll see dramatic changes. As it stands none of the clients work properly. Maybe that's their fault. Shit clients on an awesome protocol. Maybe not. Maybe the real trouble runs deeper.
What do you think about snort in terms of UX? It looks reliable to me, but let me know I'd be glad to have your opinion.
I see flourishing different purpose oriented front-end like live steam, wiki, pastebin, torrent explorer, voice over nostr (nip-100: WebRTC signaling over nostr).
App owners can cut cost and quickly spin new ideas by relying on existing relays instead of having to set an entire infrastructure.
Concerning the part on spams and harmful contents, one could provide relays that would manage custom authentication and moderation mechanisms.
App owners could make the choice of limiting their user base to access those specific "safe" relays at nearly 0 cost to update.
With private relays, there are incentive mechanisms for the market to provide custom communication filtering services to the front-end devs.
What do you think?
Maybe I'm wrong, maybe there at deeper trouble I didn't realize yet, let me know