Global Feed Post Login
Replying to Avatar rado1

I was big fan of xmpp until I have to admin our company internal server (can ignore all the s2s stuff).

I was surprised how poor is a basic protocol description. Any functionality expecting from common messenger is provided by some protocol extension (XEP).

Many of them never have passed "draft stage" touched last time 15y ago. It's not easy to find server and client supporting some pretty list of XEPs. We are using pidgin client (Linux+Win support) and I'm pretty tired answering questions like "I want feature XXX I can use on my Miranda". My typical answer is "sorry, Pidgin just cannot do it". Or "this is unaccepted protocol extension (XEP) and every client implements it different and uncompatible version."

Yes. If you want to send simple text message, it's fine.

But it's mostly abandonware.

Avatar
rado1 1y ago

Just for clarification - I didn't mean "the xmpp is abandonware" is based on quality of pidgin. This my sentence is based on release dates of XEPs and the big number of them (generaly implemented across servers and clients) never moved from "draft" stage.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

No replies yet.