Sex is anatomy. Gender is how society interprets that anatomy.

If gender were purely biological, men wearing dresses would be “unnatural” everywhere and in every era.

Yet for most of human history — from Roman tunics to Scottish kilts — it was completely normal. Bodies didn’t change. Social rules did.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

At festival recently a friend, very much a straight man, weres a dress on occasion, no one bats an eye, or judges

Props to your friend, seems to have balls.

If it’s no problem, then go out on a Friday night with your boys in a dress and tell me about your experiences after :)

Because how would you know?

#DontTrustVerify

I've no interest in doing that. Not my thing.. Irrelevant really. Gender is male female, the rest is mostly coping with trauma.

No doubt you disagree, whatever. 1st world problems.

Yeah, I honestly expected that.

Not your thing is just an excuse to not say: I lack the balls.

Because deep down you know you’d get weird looks and be judged, by other males who are just as fragile.

Gender used to me male female, sex. The term is now bastardised

Terms may change when morale improves.

Only reactionary bastards are salty about it.

Love ya anyways 🫶🏼

I just think it is avwaste of energy. Headspace, if someone wants to be something they are not, who cares. As long as the don't hurt others, AND don't push it as a natural, normal thing, because it isn't.

All oppressive belief systems are built on the three N's:

Normal

Natural

Necessary

Thank you for pointing out 2/3 of your sexist belief-system. Because everyone knows: only monogamous heterosexual relationships are normal, natural and necessary ;)

Not what I said BT whatever

Gender should remain male/female.. Secual preference needs its own term. Not hijack an existing one.