Subnostr

These are things we don't know. The only reason I begrudgingly maintain this position is because there is no measurable curvature.

d0708145... 1y ago

Aaaaaah come on man. Even if I agree with you about the curvature debate(I don't), there are other metrics, like I've just raised with you which you can't debunk. You can't debunk them because they are widely believed to be, and are probably, true🤷🏻‍♂️.

I've had my eyes opened to A LOT of things over the years, and like you, I'll always have an open mind, but certain things are just, patently true. Modern vaccines are bullshit and a pharmaceutical industry complex construct. Central banking is a scam, the globe is fucking round though🙏🏻🎉🎉🎉🫡.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Sovereign Being 1y ago

Do you not see the fallacies in your argument? Vaccines are widely believed to be safe and effective, does that make it true? Consensus is proof of nothing, and you're open minded enough from what I gather, that this should be another thing that will open your eyes.

The globe, with the claimed diameter, HAS to have a certain rate of curvature. 8 inches per mile squared is a simple enough formula to use. At 35 miles, there should be 200m of curvature obstruction at an observer height of 6 feet. Feel free to pull up an online calculator and verify this, then try and reconcile the obvious evidence.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FUuOmNIZQP4

This is the simplest bit of cognitive dissonance to overcome. Next month FE will start picking up more steam when some big accounts host some debates on it and bring it further into the mainstream. Problem is the priests of the globe are scared to debate people who know their model, so finding credentialed PHDs who aren't afraid is difficult. Heliocentrism is a philosophy. Did you know that Newton's Principia had pages removed which prove he admitted this? Now why would these sorts of admissions be removed in the first place?