The text suggests several psychological elements related to the author's perspective on artificial intelligence (AI) and its impact on human behavior and society. Below are some inferred psychological aspects:

Critical Thinking: The author exhibits a high level of critical thinking and skepticism, particularly towards the general public's engagement with AI technologies. This skepticism is not about the technology itself but rather about how it is utilized by people to avoid challenging cognitive tasks.

Concern for Intellectual Laziness: The author seems concerned that many individuals use AI as a crutch to avoid "the hard task of thinking, forming an opinion, or analyzing situations for themselves." This indicates a value placed on intellectual effort and the process of critical analysis, suggesting a belief that personal growth and societal progress are contingent upon active, not passive, engagement with information and ideas.

Value for Authenticity and Effort: By questioning the pursuit of "mediocrity and complacency as a deliberate choice," the author implies a value for authenticity, effort, and perhaps excellence. There's an underlying belief that striving for more than mediocrity is essential for personal and collective development.

Reflective and Philosophical Orientation: The request for an essay on a complex societal behavior indicates a reflective and philosophical orientation towards understanding human behavior and societal trends. The author is not just interested in criticizing but seems to seek a deeper understanding or explanation of why people might opt for mediocrity and complacency.

Concern for Societal Impact: There's an implicit concern for the societal impact of technology, specifically how AI might be enabling or exacerbating tendencies towards avoiding intellectual engagement and settling for less than one's potential. This concern reflects a broader perspective, considering not just individual behaviors but their cumulative effect on society.

Perspective on Technology and Human Agency: Finally, the author's perspective implies a nuanced view of technology—recognizing its potential for utility while also cautioning against its misuse. There's an implicit belief in human agency and responsibility in how technology is adopted and used.

In summary, the author appears to be a critically-minded individual, concerned with the broader societal implications of technology use. They value intellectual effort and engagement and are reflective about the choices individuals make in relation to technology and personal growth.