And I'm going to explain it for dummies.

Are there good or bad street gangs?

Gang A steals from people, they do violence against the people of gang B and also against people who do not belong to any gang, sometimes they even kill.

Gang B steals from the people, they exert violence against the people of gang A and also against people who do not belong to any gang, sometimes they even kill.

Sometimes territorial disputes arise between gang A and gang B, maybe from an objective point of view (of private property) one of the two gangs is more right, maybe one gang has started the aggression first, but for sure in other occasions it has been the other gang that has started the aggression first. Does that make gang A or B good depending on who you consider that has aggregated first or has invaded their territory this time?

Isn't it impossible for you to position yourself in favor of either gang simply because they are criminals who steal and murder? Isn't it right that these gangs should disappear so that everyone can live in peace?

Now substitute gangs for states.

nostr:note1wvm687cunjdn4rq7fchz27s7xh9y3jl40hckrqa4dpwqvsdzjyess05euw