Because you said that the state is the currently chosen arbiter for said violence and I agree.
At the same time I believe we can do better while the new arbiter of soft power (still violence) shifts to a technocratic model.
Don't fight the old fights. Prepare for the new system.
A government is a government. It doesn't matter who is in charge. What matters is how much the system facilitates negotiation.
I have heard people say that the ideal political system is one with a single benevolent and immortal dictator , but those people are wrong. Dictatorships don't respect citizens. It doesn't matter who is in charge.
A technocratic model sounds like a really fancy dictatorship. Have I misunderstood your proposal?
This is not my proposal. This is where I see humanity heading for.
And yes chances are abyssimal small that a technocratic structure won't result inna full blown dictatorship.
That's not what I was saying at all. I just don't know what you mean by a "technocratic" structure. Can you tell me what would make one government technocratic as opposed to non-technocratic?
