I guess it was, but if so, there's a whole lot of cross referencing that doesn't really put a user's thought to the test.
Is it your plan to only do this in a ecash manner?
Otherwise I'd also enjoy riddles for example.
Anyway, I dig any puzzles so feel free to make another!
I disagree.
I went on a rabbit hole on braille, and learned a ton of new things. I didn't realise that even English and US English braille is different. Some don't use cases, some are used for maths and science.
But I'm the sort that goes on Wikipedia journeys, hoping from page to page, learning all sorts of useless stuff. 😅
Disagree on what? The cross reference part?
Well ok, guess I'm not qualified to judge the methodology here, I am probably underestimating this shit a lot.
I also do the wiki thing because my interests are connected to so many other things.
I know I'm slightly retarded in some respects, but I put some thought into it. I started with zero knowledge of braille, so the clues helped me get off zero. I found it more interesting than a riddle, cypher or code, and I liked the way the reward was right there in front of us, once you knew what you were looking at.
