How about revising the First Amendment to read "Congress shall make no law." Full stop. Period.
They can make recommendations. ☺️
"In the ideal, the experts would inform rather than dictate and we would be capable of using that information to make our best individual choices." – nostr:nprofile1qqsywnwsaj4jk7amaq90su86s4uzvmhjgyk53pgzjlw5wg7unh543ecpz4mhxue69uhhyetvv9ujuerpd46hxtnfduhszxthwden5te0wfjkccte9eekummjwsh8xmmrd9skctcppemhxue69uhkummn9ekx7mp0av6pvy
If you feel like we still need agencies such as the EPA, or the FDA, or the Department of Education, etc. then why not make them simply organizations that *recommend* things, not that have power to impose regulations and restrictions? If they come up with what they think is best, then let them use the power of persuasion, not compulsion, and let people decide what they think is best. Wouldn't that be *real* democracy?
And they wouldn't need to be funded by tax dollars, either.
How about revising the First Amendment to read "Congress shall make no law." Full stop. Period.
They can make recommendations. ☺️
indeed, to restore and preserve common law we must abolish the legislature
I like it.
Everything went off the rails when states got legislative organs. All modern ills can be traced back to that special moment in history, the late 1700's, when legislatures were adopted or formalized throughout the West.
Didn't some dude a few years back win a Supreme Court case proving that three letter agencies DO NOT have the right to make laws? Yeah, I just looked it up. The court overturned the Chevron doctrine taking away their right to interpret or make up laws.
All laws should require 75% + approval. Very few laws would be passed
The real problem is that the 1st Amendment should have been
“The congress and general government may not borrow any money from anyone ever.”