Nostr Web Client

I don’t know. All I’m saying is that relying on a single OS that only runs on a single device that is manufactured by Google doesn’t exactly sound like the guarantee of privacy that Graphene users suggest it is. Maybe it’s safer that other setups from some prying eyes, but seems pretty obvious that the device shouldn’t be trusted as much as most Graphene users seem to trust it.

Dan 1y ago

Many other devices are supported by GrapheneOS at a source level, and it can be built for them without modifications. Building specifically for Pixels is afaik just a manpower thing

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

corndalorian 1y ago

Being technically supported at the source level is still effectively useless though for most end users.

Dan 1y ago

Would argue that's not true for the type of user that would care to run graphene to begin with. But generally speaking, I hear what you're saying.