Replying to Avatar Sarah Fackrell

IPO also chimed in: https://www.regulations.gov/comment/PTO-C-2023-0010-0008

Like AIPLA, they don't want practitioners to be called "design patent attorneys" or "design patent agents."

Note again that: The current registration system doesn't actually ensure design competence. So if the new system involves a design-specific test, those practitioners WOULD have proved a higher degree of specialized knowledge.

Again, that's not to say that some current practitioners aren't design patent experts. But they didn't prove that by passing the current exam.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Anyway, here's IPO's proposal on nomenclature. It's less clunky that AIPLA's, at least: