Physical tracking builds a profile you can’t see but they can search anytime. And when they decide to use it, you don’t get to argue the context, just the consequences.
https://untraceabledigitaldissident.com/physical-privacy-the-week-you-saw-the-net/
An example of this.
"Self-proclaimed investor and "CIA/NSA contractor/whistleblower" Tony Seruga wrote on X about who potentially attended the D.C. protest march on Saturday. Using device data collected from the area, Seruga found it was........"
"Here's a breakdown of Seruga's data:
Device Analysis
318 mobile devices present (law enforcement, media, and demonstrators).
92% of devices had been at 5+ past D.C. protests.
67 devices tied to federal government employees, with access to secured federal buildings (DoD, VA, DHS, DOJ, FBI, Treasury).
9 devices accessed the White House Northwest Gate multiple times in the prior 30 days.
Demographics: Mostly local DMV residents; 86.7% from homes valued >$850,000, 34% from homes valued >$2.5 million. "
https://www.zerohedge.com/political/new-device-data-reveals-exactly-who-showed-white-house-protests
I don't see the point of unpredictable routes. If they decide to arrest you they will knock on the door.
True, once they have decided.
Unpredictable routes throw off physical surveillance whether it is feds building a case, the local toughs trying to decide if / when / how to rob you, or that violent ex-husband who is watching trying to determine when the kids will be home alone with the 16 year old baby sitter so they can snatch them.
There are endless threat models that don't involve warrants.
