To seek to promote regression is plainly retarded.
To seek progress through murder is insane.
Of course we want to make better offspring than ourselves. It doesn't require cloaking this parental instinct in a fancy Greek derived word.
They used to use the word "progress" when I was a child. I doubt you use eugenics in ordinary speech to signify this in relation to your progeny.
My point is that people should be asking themselves "Who would be against the improvement, via better breeding, of any group of humans?
Who would seek to always tie any mention of the concept of improving a population via better breeding, to scary images of forced sterilization and industrialized death camps?
Might these same people be intent on dysgenics for the masses, and eugenics for themselves, to better enslave humanity and cement their rule?"
that is a motte and bailey fallacy like antifascism
i don't have time for talking to people who make fake arguments
