My point is that the miners don't care if there's a URSF. They only need 51% hash power to enforce a soft fork.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

What if we assume that all verify nodes are URSF nodes? Wouldn't miners abandon MASF? This is why it looks like hardfork to me.

All you would achieve with a URSF is a chain split, and your side would likely end up like B-cash

I understand URSF will make chain split. I think it is just OK. I believe miner's side would become a B-cash likely chain.

How can we refuse MASF without chain split?

If the miners want to do it, your only option is to fork off, but why do expect your fork would win?

I admit that it can be my wishful thinking. But, isn't it a better option than just let them go softfork and do nothing? Let me know what should I do, if I don't want to see ugly softfork.

The best thing to do if there is a fork is just HODL. This all may be a psyop to get bitcoiners to dump their Bitcoin and end up holding coins on a worthless fork.

I don't understand yet😭 but it's too late in Korea. I need to go sleep. Thank you for conversation.