I don't think so.

There is no evidence, I haven't even found any strong clues.

While Snowden is historically “in on it” with Zcash due to his foundational role in the currency's privacy, the article does not imply that he is directly involved in the SEC's 2025 roundtable.

The participant is Zooko Wilcox, representing Zcash's stance on privacy.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

nah, snowden ain't in on anything,he just called zcash's crypto “the most interesting” once, walked away, and never looked back.

the “invitation” to a government roundtable is just zooko cosplaying at legitimacy, exactly the kinda sanitised theatre the state loves. pattern’s obvious: co-opt the privacy coin, scrape the shine off, and parade the remnant around as “regulatory-compliant privacy.” still smells fishy, but edward ain’t anywhere near this kitchen.

He was also promoting tor, wire, signal and bunch of other sus tech in the past.

Then again, he also recommended nostr in the past. So I guess his opinion is just normal with plenty of mistakes like anyone else around here.

Tor was a fed project from the beginning too…

Once an asset always an asset?

Assange was an asset Snowden is an agent. Look at the difference in what happened to them and it tells you all you need to know.