Would you use noncustodial zaps with
1) LND
2) LND
3) Eclair
4) I don't know / neither
Discussion
LND! πΆπΎπ«‘ please πΆπΎπ«‘ππ»
Yes, LND via Blixt
You don't count, you have it already!
It doesnβt have zaps support actually (Iβm against it :().
But yeah for sure I have a non-custodial Lightning Address on nostr.
π₯π₯π₯
CLN
LND only because I already use it, no other reason.
Loool i thought you excluded CLN on purpose, because of the latest drama
FWIW, I'm looking to ultimately set myself up via an Umbrel build deployed on Ubuntu, to self-custody any zap-related stuff myself. Will be using LND.
LND, LN Bits, BOLT12
1 and 2 - LND, but that's because I'n running that node for more than two years already. =) Never looked into other solutions tho..
I'm using a self-custodial wallet for receiving zaps with Ligess.
5) LND
5) gm
LND first then if you don't mind maybe you can add CLN and Eclair later
CLN
I currently use custodial WoS for this, because my public CLN node went down and I donβt want to dox pubkey of my home node.