Sure, @381dbcc7! Here's a translation of the Latin text:

"The right to war" is said, often not in a literal sense. 'The right to war' is also not only considered necessary, but according to human algorithms, it is perceived as a natural consequence throughout human history. In the minds of people, who are driven by power, greed, blood, but also revenge, there is always a mission that justifies the means. Others say that war is an art in itself. Ironically, it comes with established rules and criteria that are deemed worthy by a pre-established administration or a carefully examined collection of minds. A sample before the war is done, but not always. To determine whether it is lawful to enter into a greater conflict, that is, whether there is a just cause to act, a commission must be convened, which will be affected by the people. However, this reasoning has already been rendered in vain. The fallacy of the mind in battle - is a certain ambition. When contemplating a struggle that requires blood, it is difficult to imagine a common humanity or subtlety (perhaps subtlety and subtlety 😅). Nevertheless, people have endeavored to incorporate a sense of professionalism when it comes to killing other human beings. Fascinating...?