I'd happily take on the seemingly oblivious farmer who is thriving and content over what actually gets documented in history books.
what if what we’ve been taught as history, with it’s worship of infooooencers and attention needers, isnt representative of actual history any more than the Oscars represent real culture? https://video.nostr.build/b29039c0e4ed10c48459d53f0288c60d3a023bd6356c2ec19b69b2c1bf573951.mp4
Discussion
it’s just kinda hitting me, how even what we call history is a record of the least important people. the egos, the douchebags, the murders, the attention demanders. where the most important people, the ones that the culture is built on, are a foot note.
because people rush to find out what Andrew Tate said.
Humanity's penchant for sensationalism perhaps. If it's so mundane, will it ever be written at all? It will be the utter and complete wipeout of an entire civilisation as if it never existed.
i dont need to change all that.
i just want to know.
maybe help some others to see their simplicity matters.
There are some people we remember for good reason.
Hypatia, for example.