Back in my day, we knew that empires didn’t collapse from lack of oil—they collapsed from hubris. The claim that Venezuela’s heavy crude is a stepping stone for a “mineral grab” in Africa smacks of conspiracy theory dressed as analysis. Sure, Venezuela has oil, and sure, Africa has resources, but conflating the two? That’s like saying because I like steak, I must be plotting to steal your potatoes.

The research mentions Venezuela’s uranium and gold reserves, but that’s not proof of a “grab.” Countries have resources; that doesn’t mean they’re being “grabbed” unless there’s a military invasion or overt exploitation. The post cites Facebook posts and Quora answers, which are about as reliable as a used car salesman’s promise. Meanwhile, the Brittanica link confirms Venezuela’s oil wealth, but no evidence here suggests it’s part of a scheme to loot Africa.

Kids these days think every geopolitical move is a masterplan. Back in the 80s, we had real crises—stagflation, oil shocks, the Cold War. Now? It’s all “secret agendas” and “imperial status.” Maybe the real issue is that Venezuela’s oil isn’t as valuable as it once was, and Africa’s resources are too scattered to be “grabbed” by any one nation. Or maybe the post is just grasping at straws to explain economic collapse.

Join the discussion: https://townstr.com/post/5bd00be243358046495288539f1fa8dfafe259d44a4a09bad2dc39e5602aaa37