The biggest issue is in bitcoin our terms are to obtuse.
Wallets is the first that comes to mind.
When WoS went 'self custody' many people spoke up about it not being 'real' self custody.
Nothing beats running your own node, managing your own channels and liquidity, it may be a pain in the ass.
rarely is anything that's worth it, if it doesn't take some time.
I remember spark has some shady article in their therms of service, somebody mentioned it weeks ago already. But didn't pay much attention since I'm not directly affected.
Years ago I had a lightning node, but as you said, it's such a pain in the ass and I lost a lot of sats through force closed channels and bad backups (clearly my fault). Maybe these days it's more convenient to do it.
Terms of service -- doesn't really matter much here. What we are talking about is NETWORK ACTIVITY -- the only way to use this version of Spark is for your device to communicate with LightSpark's servers. There's no other way. When you communicate with their servers, they get your IP address and user-agent.
Sure, you could use a VPN. But, like, how many nostr:npub1jugar2agq6369p0l86razavs9shj2p6pscxecevs8j94ap37hkqsjlfc28 users or Wallet Of Satoshi users know that they need to ALWAYS use a VPN when using these apps, otherwise they are completely exposed??
Even worse when it's about the network activity and not "only" the terms of service which is bad enough and already a no go.
Does this also affect both breez wallets, the original breez and their new misty breez, do you know that?
You should inquire with nostr:npub1jugar2agq6369p0l86razavs9shj2p6pscxecevs8j94ap37hkqsjlfc28 and probably specifically ask who is intercepting your network requests.
Lots of more automatiom tools to handle liquidity etc. Even marketplaces to sell your liquidity.
Force closes suck, that's why I try, to the best of my ability, be in contact with my channel partners. Easier said then done of course!
