Replying to Avatar Niel Liesmons

Agreed and yes I read that book ✅.

My point is that I don't think DNA is much more than a determinant of what proteins can get made. It dues not contain information on morphology etc etc... AND it can morph into entirely different DNA in certain conditions. Inheritance is mostly resonance (morphic fields, ...).

So that's why I'm weary of calculations that use genes as some kind of proof for things like family trees, especially in time periods with violent changes in magnetic + other fields 😅
Avatar
ᴛʜᴇ ᴅᴇᴀᴛʜ ᴏꜰ ᴍʟᴇᴋᴜ 1y ago

ah, well, the question of morphology is a good one... one change in the DNA you get 6 fingers or double the height

the morphology stuff is telegraphic and environmentally controlled i think, telegraphic as in, seemingly unrelated small changes in several areas can cause a radically different morphology

part of morphology even comes from how the growth accumulates, the "scaling" part of the process of growth

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

No replies yet.