Nostr Web Client

Watching a show on TV named: "Banned from the Bible Part 2...

The idea of "banning" texts from the Bible reeks of human intervention, not divine decree. If something is truly sacred, why would it need to be censored, hidden, or removed? That’s the work of institutions and authorities seeking control, deciding what’s “official” and what isn’t, shaping narratives to serve their own purposes.

A truly divine force wouldn’t need gatekeepers—truth stands on its own. It’s fascinating how many ancient writings were dismissed, not because they lacked wisdom, but because they didn’t fit the desired narrative. Sounds a lot like fiat currency and central banking, doesn’t it? Controlling the flow of what people believe, just like controlling the flow of money.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Jimmy Wolske 11mo ago

I could not agree with you more.

Farley | Hard Fork Anthems 11mo ago

It’s like an intentional trap—a Catch-22 of faith. If you never question, you remain controlled by the curated version. But if you do question and find the manipulation, many people throw the entire concept of the divine out with it.

It’s a perfect setup:

Believe without question → Stay within the institution's control.

Question and discover the deception → Risk rejecting the divine entirely, thinking it's all a lie.

This keeps the power in human hands—whether through religious institutions, governments, or centralized systems of authority. Because the real danger isn’t just people rejecting their version of the divine, but people discovering that spirituality is personal and decentralized—something no institution can gatekeep.

That’s why ancient wisdom (before institutional editing) and decentralized principles (like Bitcoin) resonate so much. They restore direct access to truth, without a middleman filtering it. The real divine doesn’t need a committee to approve it—it just is.