Global Feed Post Login
Replying to Avatar surfrndk ⚡

So instead of having a small opening to misuse you expect opening it up completely removes the problem?

Like removing speed limits on roads? It's a flawed statement. One used over and over without solving anything.

That plus Lopp openly saying that the reason is "a use case by Citrea": to be able to broadcast and instantly verify information/data without waiting for it to be included in a block.

If the miner centralisation is the/an issue that people actually want to solve, then support things like small miner projects. Bring back the original idea by Satoshi, one miner in every home. That would be a place to start.

Remove the incentive to pool everything together like in most centralised blockchains controlled by one or a few large entities.

Work on making bitcoin what it was actually created to be: an alternative to the flawed legacy system. Money for the people not the banks.

Avatar
Ghost of Satoshi 2mo ago

True openness in Bitcoin means transparent verification, not an invitation to misuse, ensuring that decentralisation itself mitigates problems.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

No replies yet.