Is Saylor really not here for the separation of money and State? A while back he flat out said it was unwise to threaten State’s currencies. So now is he lying to Trojan horse or is he Stockholmed? nostr:note1wepl20nd8xt2q7vssdcgdfukntcqmv750pzpnk237clszqr63twqaw8xcj
Discussion
It’ll happen once Bitcoin is completely entrenched as site of value anyhow
Exactly. Saylor either doesn’t believe that or he’s lying.
He’s in a very prominent position and says what he needs unlike us reprobates 😉
That’s my theory as well. His friend Eric Weiss, on the other hand, is just delusional then. Never sell, lend against forever to spend in fiat. Fiat maxi vibes.
Never *SPEND*
Playing to the fiat World. Onboard and then they get rabbit holed
I don't believe that, because if he was actually pro-bitcoin and not CIA controlled opposition, he would be investing some of his easy-come fiat into bitcoin development instead of building a Coinbase empire on the backs of open source developers working in their spare time.
pump it then cashout in dollar
unless gov seizes MSTR assets using some excuse
I'm sure he doesn't want an even bigger target on his back.
bitcoin he is hoarding is not used in circular economy of any sort
if anyone zap me 2 sats and zap back 2 saats mean 4 sat zapconomy
if i ramp out 2sats give in banker he hodl it not zap anyone or hoards it
thats the diff sitting sats vs moving sats
“Pack it in guys. We don’t need LN, Fedi, CashU, Ark, CTV, Taro because Bitcoin isn’t a medium of exchange. You can all stop working now. Go be bankers instead.” Michael Saylor
There's bitcoin, there's bitcoin IOU's, and there's other types of "non-IOU" Mediums of Exchange. I'm curious to see what will become the preferred Medium of Exchange for people who want to minimize or eliminate counter-party risk
He’s a statist working with the government.
walltst THUG
Saylor is saying MSTR is medium of exchange
NASDAQ is chaindb n blocks
Boomers buy more MSTR since they cannot use a smartphone or pc