Bitcoin’s design assumes personal responsibility.
Self-custody is not a preference.
It is a requirement of the system.
When Bitcoin is held through an intermediary, ownership becomes conditional. Access depends on policy, solvency, and permission. The holder no longer controls settlement. They hold a claim, not the asset itself.
This recreates the structure Bitcoin was designed to remove.
Self-custody restores finality.
If you control the keys, you control the bitcoin.
No counterparty is required to approve, reverse, or honour the transaction.
Running a node completes this.
A node does not create Bitcoin.
It verifies it.
By running a node, you independently enforce the rules you rely on. You decide what is valid. You do not outsource consensus to miners, exchanges, ETFs, or developers. Without nodes, Bitcoin becomes a set of promises rather than a protocol.
Verification is the separation of Bitcoin from trust.
Paper Bitcoin emerges when verification is abandoned.
ETFs, custodial accounts, treasury vehicles, and synthetic exposure all increase price exposure while reducing monetary integrity. They concentrate coins, fragment ownership, and introduce leverage. More claims are created than bitcoin available for settlement.
This is how gold was neutralised.
It is how fiat systems are maintained.
Paper markets suppress volatility until they fail. When confidence breaks, claims exceed reserves and settlement becomes impossible. The underlying asset survives. The claims do not.
Bitcoin resists this only if users do.
Self-custody prevents rehypothecation.
Nodes prevent rule changes by decree.
Usage prevents capture.
Bitcoin does not need institutional endorsement to function.
It needs individuals who verify and settle honestly.
Hard money only works if it is used as hard money.
Everything else is convenience layered on top of risk.
The protocol is simple.
The responsibility is not optional.
#Bitcoin #SelfCustody #NodeRunner
