Cool story, but it disregards one important fact.

Almost everyone can live within their means if they want to. Live on one income. You don’t have to be an “Elite” to achieve this. It’s all about letting go of the need to impress people. Actually that’s 10 times more “Elite” than being “Elite”.

It’s societal pressure that sent us all working because we all want to drive the fanciest cars and live in the biggest houses, but it is all fake and will go away when we die.

Anyone can do it if you are Elite enough to not care about societal pressure. (Similar to your moped story)

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Agree, but I’m not using elite as a value judgement. Just a descriptor of this type of person.

I understand. But it’s described as a reward of being successful or Elite status signal to have a beautiful, intelligent, none working wife.

I disagree.

Literally almost anyone can do it.

True, but again I’m describing coastal elites and their status games which are based on credentialism and social pedigree.

Elite has nothing to do with perceived wealth or status.

Elite is a lifestyle. Radical excellence.

Yeah, I come from a completely different culture, these words don’t even register with me. The entire premise of the argument is in another dimension.

I reject this standard of temporary Eliteness you describe. It’s like you are talking fiat language of leverage and arbitrage, while I feel like opted out of that system and I just stack sats.

Personally I’m guided by spiritual excellence. Not that I’m there, but that’s my compass.

Being guided by spiritual excellence is Eliteness of another form. Different words for the same aspirations.

Being Elite among Men is a triffling matter to the spiritual beings that govern our world yet we follow their teachings aspirationally in an effort to align with them. It's a different form of elite-ism.

Exactly, it’s a different world where the original post means nothing.

Eh. Original post highlights a game being played by many. Not one worth playing, which you'd seem to agree with, but still being played. Good to underatand the games of others.

Know thy enemy...

Not that those playing the other games are an enemy, but rather everyone who is not align with incentives is at odds with each other, creating an adversarial like condition. Luckily, bitcoin makes it so the games we play require no violence to win.