Terms should be written "to a reading comprehension of the youngest person permitted to use the services".

This is... odd.

If a site genuinely has no age restriction, because it has no need for it, it means it needs to make its terms comprehensible to, say, six or seven year olds?!

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Hmmm... I wonder if a site can say "if you cannot read and understand these terms, I'm afraid that you are not permitted to use this site".