I submitted a pull request for this, it was not received well.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Of course it wasn't. It was perfectly sensible but didn't originate from the cool kids.

It sucks that you got rejected, but . . . it is something that I am agitating for, and it WILL be a thing in at least a few clients in the future, so not all hope is lost.

Keep pushing the pr. It is not intrusive and very easy to implement

I shall.

Do you have a link to your PR?

I utterly detest github, so I am, lazily, and on principle, not going to go poking at guthub to find it. But I will surely relink it.

Don't do this, please.

Put NIP-05s into NIP-05 tags, and nowhere else.

I advise against clients implementing your PR until you make it a proper extension to NIP-39.

It has no reason to not be an extension of NIP-39.

I am a cool kid, they just do not know it yet..

Good attitude.