Haha, no intention of sending you there, though it does often sound nice.

It was actually just an honest question though that I've asked myself just as often.

I'm also a big proponent of privacy improvements on the blockchain and someday it would be great to have privacy improvements where it is difficult or impossible to tell what exactly a transaction is (things like schnorr sig and taproot help). If we someday get there and all data looks the same, telling the difference between "spam" and "legit" will be a fruitless endeavour.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Privacy?

Who the hell is discussing privacy right now πŸ˜‚

My life is weird, this is also happening at the moment πŸ˜‚

nevent1qvzqqqqqqypzp6pmv65w6tfhcp73404xuxcqpg24f8rf2z86f3v824td22c9ymptqyv8wumn8ghj7enfd36x2u3wdehhxarj9emkjmn99uq32amnwvaz7tmjv4kxz7fwv3sk6atn9e5k7tcqyzvcth0zuvunwh8mxpn7tve6eenk7vjmec6xp5yf320gzpzqp04yj9sfted

Believe it or not topics can have implications on other related topics.

Yes a friend told me that once.

We don’t speak much anymore πŸ˜‚

You seem to be an adversarial type when simply confronted with questions. I won't bother you anymore.

You're fine πŸ«‚

I just don't have the answers to life the Universe and everything.

You don't? I thought 42 is the general consensus for years...

You’re a genius.

Right, you’re in charge of the Core vs Knots debate now πŸ˜‚

ok, datacarriersize shell be 42!