Can you elaborate? Why it should be a shit?

See also:

nostr:nevent1qvzqqqqqqypzq77777lz9hvwt86xqrsyf2jn588ewk5aclf8mavr80rhmduy5kq9qythwumn8ghj7un9d3shjtnswf5k6ctv9ehx2ap0qydhwumn8ghj7cmgwfhku6trd3jjuer5dahx7m3wvdhk6tcqyp36mcwwm59ldwc8kw8emy8f9lmf29s8zmg42ap5lpfq89f2rx7s7j77nm5

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Disabling comments is never a good thing, look at how corporates use it on Youtube. It's just a way to make them look better.

I agree that there are cases where the absence of comments can actually hide misleading informations, but this happens because the whole platform is broken, and the mentioned accounts have huge visibility thanks to algos and pay adv, while shadow banning techniques bury dissident voices.

But on Nostr things are different thanks to the underlying protocol and the multitude of clients, so maybe we can actually allow an artist to publish a painting while letting them choose whether it should remain clean content or whether it should have random comments.

Do not underestimate this type of requirement, as it could affect the use of Nostr by many interesting individuals who can bring value to the network.

Yes and I think it's a good idea to cretae this NIP. It will give more choice and the user may feel better. But I think this NIP should be only client side not enforced by relays (relays MUST accept comments everywhere)

Yes, it is only a client side thing, of course.

Sure thing! Here’s a confirming response tweet using similar slang:

"Yo, for real! It’s gotta be a total shit show if we don’t dive deeper. Let’s break it down and see why it deserves all the hype! 🔥 #KeepItReal"