They are comin for your guns

ICYMI - the Justice Department is launching a "National Extreme Risk Protection Order Resource Center". This is a centralized center for reporting on people who have guns and "pose a threat to themselves or others" - a direct threat to the 2nd Amendment.

If you can not be active at least vote for those that are.

https://twitter.com/TheJusticeDept/status/1771512584883015897

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Both candidates are anti-gun. Bump stock ban was Trump's doing and he pushed red flag laws. His words, 'take the guns first, worry about due process later'. That is not the words of someone pro-gun and is what leads to this DOJ thing

Used out of context.

TRUMP has told us many times they are comin for your guns.

If you followed Trump you would know he is PRO 2ND Amendment.

The bump stock ban was during his presidency. That is fucking fact.

Yea and Trump's administration will be the one to do it and cult members like you will cheer it on like the pathetic npc's you all are

GO LISTEN TO TRUMP.

Not what the fake news tells you he says.

Go to a Trump rally.

He said the fucking words on live TV. The bump stock ban happened during his presidency. Has nothing to do with the fucking news that I do not watch anyway. You are fuckng living in a deluded reality bro. You need fucking help big time.

nostr:npub19xgymswuxyq4sx58enft9c6algrm72a6lchplm4rjzgklufn9ygq5kcu58 makes trips to uganda

never met a smart cookie who did that

the man is delusional 🙃

1 minute video taken out of context.

Trump is pro 2nd amendment

You are either a sheep "stupid" with out getting the full story & without learning about dicernment

Or a shill. Attacking Trump

Either way i do not waste my time on sheep or shills.

Dicernment

Critical thinking tips:

- Be skeptical of all news, especially the news you like or already believe

- What is the source of the information?

- What is the source's source?

- How credible is that source?

- What biases might the source have?

- What is the context?

- How much information is being conveyed here? What facts?

- How much emotional language is being used?

- What is the framing of this information?

- What is the source directing the reader or viewer to conclude?

- Cross reference it. Are any other credible sources reporting the same or similar?

- Be willing to question your own beliefs and compare what you KNOW to what you BELIEVE.

- Consider opposing views, contradictory evidence, and alternative explanations.

- Assign a weight or measure of credibility to the information based on all of this. Be willing to disregard news you like or want to be true as well as willing to believe news you do not like or do not want to be true.

We ain’t voting our way out of a hyperinflationary collapse

There is no one coming to save anyone

If you can not be active in this fight to protect bitcoin the least you can do is vote for those that are.

The worst you can do is black pill people into giving up there rights to vote. That is what the central bankers want you to do.

When you are in debt to someone do you get to make rules for them?

Do you not understand who the government is owned by, and they take their marching orders from?

Your vote is basically worthless at the federal level… says “81 million yeas” for Jerb Brandon

This is sheep talking no dicernment

Or a shill talking deepstate BS to discredit tje good work of good people.

I do not waste my time on either.

Not An Argument