This has worked the best in the past to get increased viewership.
Publish to a known media outlet to engage, then self publish and use the socials to spread beyond.
Discussion
Part of me wants it to be just Bitcoiners until the answers to my questions in the article becomes more clear.
Then we can strike.
But point well taken. Assuming they pick up a "Nobody" author.
If BM is problematic, you could publish on Habla ,Parman and maybe Stackchain magazine ?
My biggest dilemma with BM is principle.
They fueled the problem I want to fix, unapologetically.
It would be fitting to include them in the fix, but it also rubs me the wrong way.
I think you have your answer there. If BM fueled the problem, the same BM whose president boasts about making lots of profit on shitcoins, their interests might not be inline with your article
That's true. Thanks.
I think I've been feeling cognitive dissonance.
I'm an eternal optimist that WANTS them to see the light themselves.
But deep down I KNOW on the whole they won't.
I'd love to have the reach they might provide, but in the end, that's asking permission and centralization of effort.
We grassroots-efforted CBDC awarenesses. We can do this here too, if it has legs.
For added reach, you can also share on twitter if you still have your account, or create a temporary one