Amethyst does this and it works great. But only Amethyst has it implemented.
Discussion
is it really edited it only amethyst users can see the edit 🤔
I’m not against adding it to damus…
Are there any drawbacks for more clients implementing it, other than of course workload?
Just more burden for interop between all kind1 clients, every new thing makes it harder to build a feature complete microblogging client.
In this case it doesn’t really break anything by not implementing it so it’s not too bad.
To do it properly would require a decent amount of UI work. I would want the ability to show that it was edited and show the original version.
I’m not philosophically against it. it is one of the most requested features next to deletion. Entire groups of people have left once they discovered there was no delete or edit, so may have to do it eventually.
People really want edit and delete. I wonder if it's a good UX to tell users the first time that they edit or delete that not all clients support these features and their changes may not be reflected everywhere? Is that too confusing?
Added edit note, and see edited note nostrability tracker.
nostr:npub1gcxzte5zlkncx26j68ez60fzkvtkm9e0vrwdcvsjakxf9mu9qewqlfnj5z can you share the spec for each of these?
Added see edited notes: https://github.com/damus-io/damus/issues/2618
Prior edit notes user story: https://github.com/damus-io/damus/issues/408
Only Amethyst users can see the change, because only Amethyst has this implemented. You can join us Will 🫂🫂🫂