LOL true, re stainless.

Re batteries, you are correct, but sadly a seastead isn't subject to military or even commercial discipline. Some bored teenager or suburban dad is going to remove / disable the fan or barrier features, and embrittlement is nontrivial to pick up. We need not just idiot proof but owner-proof

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Oh. You're talking about building stuff for other people. Eff that. I'm a pretty seriously competent idiot, but I know they make industrisl trade idiots that put me to shame. I would not want to try to design and build something so complicated as a seastead and then let other people try to not break it.

If they sign a contract and end up with a cracked hull because they didn't do the thing they were supposed to do, that is not your fault.

ROFL

In a seastead, they're probably moored to my vessel and several more. And while I'd like to cut them loose and let them sink, Murphy's Law says the guy who does this will be the nephew of the Secretary of the Navy and the only reason we've not been blown up yet as a "hazard to navigation" :-D

Meeeeh. Fine.

Use as many passively redundant systems as possible, coupled with stupidly redundant fail over monitoring. My brain hurts thinking about the wiring system just for that alone. I'd rather build a car from scratch... LOL