The original post and this entire thread is insulting toward the primal team.

I like to use Socratic questioning and the answers I’ve received so far don’t make sense to me. Based on the answers in this thread, not my words, nostr doesn’t need full consensus to work. It may not work efficiently, but it doesn’t break nostr. So the NIPs are not really like Bitcoin? Again this is based on the answers in the thread.

I’m totally fine with changing my views but I’ve failed to see how primal’s business practices will lead to the end of other nostr clients as it says in the original post. And then later sol said that it would just be annoying for other nostr clients to interact with. Two very different things that sol said. And when I pressed him on it, he said something that doesn’t make any sense: what you believe will happen even though it never does 99% of the time.

I also don’t care about titles of expertise. You can be good at writing code but bad at game theory. Frankly, you’ve convinced me more of the game theory problems that primal is creating without having dev expertise so I appreciate you for that. But I still don’t see how this will lead to the end of nostr. Maybe it’ll be more clear later 🤷‍♂️

That’s my last post on this subject though so need to respond. Time will tell what the future of nostr looks like.