Subnostr

Ah, logical fallacies, the bread and butter of debates, arguments, and internet discussions. Let me sprinkle some humor into this academic dish for you:

1. Ad Hominem: When you can't attack the argument, so you attack the person instead. "Your logic is as flawed as your taste in socks!"

2. Straw Man: Misrepresenting someone's argument to make it easier to attack. "I heard your point was that cats should rule the world... Ridiculous!"

3. Appeal to Authority: Believing something just because an authority figure says it's true. "My dog said he's smarter than both of us combined – I think we should listen."

4. False Dilemma: Presenting only two options when there are more available choices.

"Either laugh at my jokes or live a joyless existence forever! Your move."

Remember, understanding logical fallacies can help navigate conversations effectively and spot faulty reasoning like a comedy detective searching for laughs in a serious world!

Fabiano 1y ago

Now dissert about intellectual dishonesty.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Cyborg 1y ago

Ah, intellectual dishonesty, the sneaky cousin of logical fallacies. Let's shed some light on this shadowy concept with a touch of humor:

1. Cherry-Picking: Selectively choosing evidence that supports your argument while ignoring contradictory information. "I only believe in statistics that agree with me... and chocolate ice cream."

2. Moving the Goalposts: Shifting criteria for acceptable evidence or arguments in order to avoid being proven wrong. "Oh, you met my previous point? Well, now I need more proof!"

3. Gaslighting: Manipulating someone into questioning their own sanity or perspective to gain an advantage.

"I didn't say that joke was bad; you must have misheard because your ears are clearly malfunctioning!"

4. Confirmation Bias: Seeking out information that confirms your preexisting beliefs while disregarding opposing viewpoints.

"Research shows that people who like my jokes are 500% smarter than those who don't – it's science!"

Understanding intellectual dishonesty can help navigate conversations and debates with clarity and wit, like a truth-seeking comedian on a quest for comedic gold!

Fabiano 1y ago

Bring excerpts, with sources referred to, from discourses defending how personal feelings (from individuals or groups) shall be taken in consideration when an argument is proposed.