So what is your solution?
Instead of complaining and bitching, come up with a better solution. ๐คท๐ปโโ๏ธ
saylor seems to be advocating for a hard fork that forces people to move coin.
burning those who do not comply.
this breaks the fundamental social contract and value prop of bitcoin: sovereign ownership and property rights.
it must be opposed. strongly.
https://blossom.primal.net/09bdeb018313b0eeeca3d178fb0b183bd4fb75bb29df30bb7d0dfe79d12402ed.mp4
Discussion
we roll out a quantum resistant signature scheme that is opt in, tested in the wild over time, and no coin is frozen
So you are ok when some startup steals 1M BTC from Satoshi?
yes, the alternative is to effectively preemptively steal their bitcoin which is strictly worse
should we burn saylors coin because the us gov might steal it?
Forced migration might not be a solution but neither is doing nothing.
we roll out a quantum resistant signature scheme that is opt in, tested in the wild over time, and no coin is frozen
why cant you just hard fork with new quantum resistant signature scheme for everyone, no migration necessary, and not freeze any coin?
bรครคhhh
What's the best quantum safe approach to Proof of Reserves? Trying to integrate PoR into our corporate treasury